JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 13, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

✓Claimant Diana Carolina Vargas Flores

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Reconsideracion Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuanto se dirige contra una sentencia frente a la cual no proceden recursos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de reconsideración de la Sentencia C-473/19.

La memorialista le pidió a la Corporación reconsiderar la declaratoria de inconstitucionalidad del bono de alimentación al que se accedía al ser beneficiario al subsidio de desempleo, en tanto dicha decisión afecta su situación particular.

La Sala Plena decidió RECHAZAR por improcedente la pretensión formulada, en tanto se dirige contra una sentencia frente a la cual no proceden recursos; ha hecho tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional y, se fundamenta en la afectación que ha generado la decisión a una ciudadana en particular.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente, la solicitud de reconsideracion presentada por la ciudadana Diana Carolina Vargas Flores contra la sentencia C473 de 2019 proferida en el expediente D-13063.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.